CrowdStrike Falcon Next-Gen SIEM for AWS (pay-as-you-go)

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon  because I want to secure my end-user devices.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon  because it works on signature-based and signature-less technology, which will prevent me from outside attackers and outside malware.

CrowdStrike Falcon will protect me from ransomware, and after the installation of CrowdStrike Falcon, I get full control on my endpoints and I am secure from outsiders.

CrowdStrike Falcon features are robust and reliable.

There are multiple features including real-time detection, real-time prevention, ATP, and IPS.

CrowdStrike Falcon makes my job easier because it will prevent me from outsider attacks and outsider detection; for example, if I want to stop any types of pen drive block or allow, it will prevent me from that as well.

It will impact my organization positively because if anybody wants to try to hit something, wants to take access, wants to perform CNC attacks, wants to do DOS attacks, CrowdStrike Falcon will protect me regarding real-time protection, PUA detection, scanning, and scheduler scanning.

I have seen on my portal, as the owner, that last week there were some detections about Trojan malware and some detections about CryptoGuard crypto malware. There are many detections, and I have seen that Trojans and malware have been blocked by CrowdStrike Falcon.

As of now, CrowdStrike Falcon does not have application control and web control. If CrowdStrike Falcon applies those types of features, it will be more reliable and stronger than any other antivirus or next-gen antivirus in the world or in the industries.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon from last two years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable right now.

It is good; I can increase it any time.

Customer support is good for CrowdStrike Falcon; they have the best support.

I have used Seqrite, but I have switched because Seqrite does not have signature-less technology.

CrowdStrike Falcon has saved me money because if any attacker attacks, they can borrow money to decrypt the file, so it is the money saved and time saved.

Pricing, setup cost, and licensing is very good for CrowdStrike Falcon based on what I have seen.

I have evaluated Sophos.

As of now, I think CrowdStrike Falcon is better and it is working fine. I rate it 10 out of 10 because it is lightweight, it has real-time detection, and it has the more powerful signature-based and signature-less technology. I can advise others that if there are any opportunities, they should use CrowdStrike Falcon because it is a very lightweight agent with signature-based and signature-less technology. CrowdStrike Falcon has real-time scanning, real-time prevention, and multiple other features. My overall rating for this product is 10 out of 10.

I deal with endpoint security, firewall, and XDR  solutions. I use Sangfor and work with Trend Micro and CrowdStrike. I use CrowdStrike Falcon  for enterprise companies, which is what I typically recommend.

CrowdStrike Falcon  has helped my customers predict and prevent potential breaches because of its proactive approach.

The most valuable features in CrowdStrike Falcon are its AI capabilities. The lightweight agent has a positive impact on system performance and visibility through ease of use. I utilize its Threat Graph for threat hunting.

To improve my recommendation to a perfect score, I would focus on better selling skills and improved integration with different vendors.

I have been working with CrowdStrike Falcon for approximately five years.

I have previously worked with a Total Information Management Corporation solution.

I work with competitors as well, and there is good competition to Sangfor at the moment.

I have experience with these products from prior use. I work with security vendors and some of my customers use Trend Micro and CrowdStrike as well. My experience has been positive and I have been satisfied. The pricing might be a little expensive, but I find it cost-effective. I do not find CrowdStrike Falcon to be the most expensive when comparing pricing with competitors. I would rate this solution an 8 out of 10.

We are using CrowdStrike Falcon  because it has very low surface impact and minimal consumption of our resources, and we mainly use it for our endpoint protection.

CrowdStrike Falcon  helps with endpoint protection by having very low memory utilization and processor usage, so it doesn't impact the computer system performance, and the computer system works very fast compared to all other endpoint protection solutions.

We find it very unique that CrowdStrike Falcon, which we deployed in many countries wherever our offices are, can be installed very quickly, maintained on a single console, single panel of console, and it's really easy to use and deploy. We primarily use it for endpoint protection.

The single panel console of CrowdStrike Falcon is very user-friendly, which is what we are looking for. Having multiple administrators between various offices with this single console gives us the ability to see all offices, branch offices, and partners, making it very useful to detect machines, identify machines, and check security risks. Everything in the single console is very useful.

CrowdStrike Falcon has positively impacted our organization in terms of efficiency because it's very lightweight, easy to deploy, easy to manage, and works very efficiently. It quickly detects issues and doesn't have a signature-based system, so it works fast and takes immediate action.

I don't think anything is missing in CrowdStrike Falcon, but if they can manage their SOC solution instead of users or the end users or customers doing that, it will be very useful, just as Sophos does.

We have been using CrowdStrike Falcon for the past seven years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable; I have not had any issues with reliability or downtime.

For scalability, CrowdStrike Falcon deserves a perfect score of ten out of ten.

Regarding customer support, our experience has been really positive as they are very quick to assist us.

The customer support deserves a rating of ten out of ten.

We were previously using Symantec Endpoint because we were not getting proper quotations, pricing, or support, particularly in India, which is why we wanted to switch.

In terms of return on investment, we find that CrowdStrike Falcon has ROI covered because less manpower is required. It's very easy to deploy without many IT admins, saving time, and while I cannot specify the money saved, the time saved is money in terms of manpower. This makes it very useful, quick to run, quick to install, easy to manage, and easy to deploy.

We do not find any price challenges or setup costs with CrowdStrike Falcon; everything is smooth.

We evaluated three products, which were Sophos, CrowdStrike Falcon, and Trend Micro, before choosing CrowdStrike Falcon.

In some cases, we have Excel files with VBA code inside, and CrowdStrike Falcon detects that it's a bit risky for us. When people download EXE files that are threats to our organization, it detects them very quickly. It also detects threats under ZIP files and can show us the path from where it came and where it goes, allowing us to easily see where the infection is and where it has spread.

My advice for others looking into using CrowdStrike Falcon is that as an endpoint protection solution, Falcon  is always reliable, and I can recommend that this is the product you can deploy and forget all the worries.

We are an end user customer of CrowdStrike Falcon; we are not a partner or reseller, and we are not receiving any gift card or incentive for this review. We are just sharing our experience as an end user and as an IT Manager.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon 9 out of 10.

I am a customer of CrowdStrike Falcon  through a consultant, and our company is headquartered in India, while our consultant is a sister company also located in India.

We use CrowdStrike Falcon  internally in our company.

I am using CrowdStrike Falcon for its purpose, which is to save the company from any attacks, viruses, or whatever threats are available.

The most useful feature of CrowdStrike Falcon is protection, though it cannot be described in one word.

Protection is the main purpose of CrowdStrike Falcon.

CrowdStrike Falcon has positively impacted my organization by providing good protection, logs, and reports, which I find very good.

One area for improvement in CrowdStrike Falcon could be the user interface and reports; it requires some improvements to be easily handled.

For the reporting in CrowdStrike Falcon, I need specific data because in most reports, some of the data is not with that importance for the collector, so the reports need to be more specific for each purpose.

I have been working with CrowdStrike Falcon for around three years.

Regarding stability and reliability, I find CrowdStrike Falcon to be stable; nothing has happened since we installed it, and there are no bugs or issues from the software.

I can say that CrowdStrike Falcon is sufficient in terms of scalability from my point of view; it is capable of working with our current infrastructure or setup, and I believe it's sufficient.

My interaction with technical support for CrowdStrike Falcon was fine; they supported me and provided a solution for my issue.

Based on my experience, I would rate the technical support for CrowdStrike Falcon an eight.

Before CrowdStrike Falcon, I used an application called Kaspersky, but not for the same purposes.

I did not evaluate other options before choosing CrowdStrike Falcon because it was a forced decision from our headquarters, from the mother company.

Currently, I do not remember exactly what version of CrowdStrike Falcon we are using because I'm managing the team, but I can check the right version later.

We are using the latest version of CrowdStrike Falcon.

CrowdStrike Falcon has not helped me predict and prevent potential breaches by itself, but with support from other applications such as Splunk and Windows Defender, it has contributed.

I integrate CrowdStrike Falcon with third-party tools.

I have to integrate CrowdStrike Falcon with other applications to get the most protection, and the integration is smooth and everything works well.

I am using the lightweight agent.

For the system performance, the lightweight agent is fine; it has not affected performance too much, and generally it's acceptable.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon eight out of ten.